Monday 3 October 2016

Internal Combustion engine

Aniinternalicombustionienginei(ICE) is a heat engine where the combustion of a fuel occurs with an oxidizer (usually air) in a combustion chamber that is an integral part of the working fluid flow circuit. In an internal combustion engine the expansion of the high-temperature and high-pressureigases producediby combustion apply direct force to some component of the engine. The force is applied typicallyito pistons, turbine blades, rotor or a nozzle. This force moves the component over a distance, transforming chemical energy into useful mechanical energy.
The first commercially successful internal combustion engine was created by Étienne Lenoir around 1859 and the first modern internal combustion engine was created in 1876 by Nikolaus Otto.
The term internal combustioniengine usually refers to an engine in which combustion is intermittent, such as the more familiar four-stroke and two-stroke piston engines, along with variants, such as the six-stroke pistoniengine and the Wankel rotary engine. A second class of internal combustion engines use continuous combustion: gas turbines, jet engines and most rocket engines, each of which are internal combustion engines on the same principle as previously described.Firearms are also a form of internal combustion engine.
Internal combustion engines are quite different from external combustion engines, such as steam or Stirling engines, in which the energy is delivered to a working fluid not consisting of, mixed with, or contaminated by combustion products. Working fluids can be air, hot water, pressurized water or even liquid sodium, heated in a boiler. ICEs are usually powered by energy-dense fuels such as gasoline or diesel, liquids derived from fossil fuels. While there are many stationary applications, most ICEs are used in mobile applications and are the dominant power supply for vehicles such as cars, aircraft, and boats.
Typically an ICE is fed with fossil fuels like natural gas or petroleum products such as gasoline, diesel fuel or fuel oil. There's a growing usage of renewable fuels like biodiesel for compression ignition engines and bioethanol or methanol for spark ignition engines. Hydrogen is sometimes used, and can be made from either fossil fuels or renewable energy.
Reciprocating piston engines are by far the most common power source for land and water vehicles, including automobiles, motorcycles, ships and to a lesser extent, locomotives (some are electrical but most use Diesel engines). Rotary engines of the Wankel design are used in some automobiles, aircraft and motorcycles.
ICEs drive some of the large electric generators that power electrical grids. They are found in the form of combustion turbines in combined cycle power plants with a typical electrical output in the range of 100 MW to 1 GW. The high temperature exhaust is used to boil and superheat water to run a steam turbine. Thus, the efficiency is higher because more energy is extracted from the fuel than what could be extracted by the combustion turbine alone. In combined cycle power plants efficiencies in the range of 50% to 60% are typical. In a smaller scale Diesel generators are used for backup power and for providing electrical power to areas not connected to an electric grid.
Small engines (usually 2‐stroke gasoline engines) are a common power source for lawnmowers, string trimmers, chain saws, leafblowers, pressure washers, snowmobiles, jet skis, outboard motors, mopeds, and motorcycles
Where very high power-to-weight ratios are required, internal combustion engines appear in the form of combustion turbines or Wankel engines. Powered aircraft typically uses an ICE which may be a reciprocating engine. Airplanes can instead use jet engines and helicopters can instead employ turboshafts; both of which are types of turbines. In addition to providing propulsion, airliners may employ a separate ICE as an auxiliary power unit. Wankel engines are fitted to many unmanned aerial vehicles.
The Abbé Hautefeuille described in 1678, an engine for raising water, in which the motive power was obtained by burning gunpowder in a cylinder and cooling the remaining gases with water. The idea was similar to that expressed in the early forms of the steam engine, but Hautefeuille does not appear to have preformed any actual experiments. The same idea was suggested by Huygens in 1680, but experiments made by him and later by Denis Papinwere not attended by success and were abandoned, though they are interesting as representing the first actual attempts at the building of internal-combustion engines.

A long period of inaction followed. The discovery of the distillation of gas from coal and the demonstration, by Murdock in 1792, of the application of coal gas for lighting purposes roused new interest in the subject. The introduction of the steam engine for commercial purposes about this time was also a powerful incentive, though for many decades the steam engine was too firmly intrenched and fitted the existing conditions too well to afford much opportunity for competition. About 1791 John Barber explained in a patent how a wheel with vanes could be driven by the released pressure of an orifice close to the vanes. In the century and a quarter that have elapsed since that day, no economical gas turbine has been constructed.
The first internal-combustion engine, according to our modern ideas, was that of Robert Street, patented in England in 1794. In this the bottom of a cylinder was heated by fire and a small quantity of tar or turpentine was projected into the hot part of the cylinder, forming a vapor. The rising of the piston sucked in a quantity of air to form the explosion mixture and also flame for ignition. The cycle was that which was used later by Lenoir in the first commercially successful engine. About 1800 Phillippe Lebon patented in France an engine using compressed air, compressed gas and electricity for ignition. Some authorities believe that his early death retarded the development of the internal-combustion engine half a century, as all of the features mentioned are necessary to the highly efficient engines of today, though they did not come into use for three-quarters of a century after his death.
The next engine to attain any considerable prominence was that of Samuel Brown, who secured several patents in England about 1825. His engine did not represent an advance, since the old ideas of Huygens were employed instead of the advanced ideas of Street. The success of the atmospheric steam engines was probably responsible for this. Brown's engine consisted of a number of large chambers, in which the hot gases produced by flame were cooled by the injection of water, thus forming a partial vacuum. The working pistons, in cylinders adjacent to the large chambers, were operated by atmospheric pressure, all pistons being connected to the same crankshaft, as shown in Fig. 1. Since the burning did not occur in the working cylinder, the engine can scarcely be called an internal-combustion engine in the accepted sense of the term. The inventor appears to have been a man of considerable force, and a number of his engines were built for pumping and for driving carriages and boats. In 1833, W. L. Wright patented in England, the engine illustrated in Fig. 2. The gas and air were supplied by separate pumps to a working cylinder. The charge was contained in the spherical bulbs near the ends of the cylinder, ignition occurring while the piston was at the end of the stroke. The engine was double acting, water jacketed, with poppet exhaust valves and a fly-ball governor. It represented a great advance in design and was probably built, though no records of its performance are known to exist.
In 1838 William Barnett patented in England an engine which was an advance upon preceding types in that country. It compressed the gas and air separately, igniting the mixture when the piston was at the end of its stroke. The third engine described by this inventor is shown in Fig. 3, and is interesting because it embodies several features of the modern two-cycle engine. In the figure the piston is supposed to be moving upward, compressing a mixture of gas and air. Ignition occurs when the piston has reached its highest position, and the piston driven down, expansion occurring until the piston passes the exhaust port at the middle of the cylinder. During the latter half of the stroke the pumps are forcing gas and air into space below the piston, The compression being completed by the working piston and an explosion occurring when the piston reaches its lowest position. One of the interesting features of this engine was the use of spongy platinum for ignition, though Barnett also devised an exceedingly ingenious igniting cock of burning gas jets.
The well known hot-tube method of ignition, which later became popular and has only in comparatively recent times been supplanted by electric ignition, was patented in America by Drake, and later, in 1855, by Newton, in England. The engine of Barsanti-Matteucci Engine, patented in 1857, is interesting because it illustrates a type of machine that was the first to achieve a real commercial success, though that good fortune din not happen to its Italian inventors. It is illustrated in Fig. 4. Gas and air were exploded under the piston, which was driven upward, finally coming to a rest when all of the work of the explosion had been done. The piston, descending under the pressure of atmosphere, did the work. Lenoir, of France, patented in 1860, the first engine to attain considerable use. In general, it resembled a double-acting steam engine, with a slide valve for the admission and another for the exhaust. This engine was well advertised and attained considerable use, though its economy was not very good. It was deemed of sufficient merit, however, to secure awards from the Exposition of London in 1862, of Paris in 1867, and Vienna in 1873. The improvement on the Lenoir engine by Hugon brought its inventor some prominence, but its success was short lived, as the new Otto-Langen free-piston engine, which was exhibited at the Paris Exposition in 1867, Carried all before it and held command of the market for many years, during which time a large number were built.
The Lenoir engine admitted gas and air for part of the stroke, after which the explosion occurred and then an expansion. An indicator card for this engine is shown in Fig. 5. All of these engines, it will be noted, were non-compression engines. In 1860, Beau de Rochas stated the conditions required for the efficiency of an internal-combustion engine as follows:

1) The greatest volume of the cylinder having a given surface of periphery.
2) Highest possible velocity of motion.
3) Greatest possible expansion.
4) Greatest possible pressure at commencement of the expansion.

Beau de Rochas also described the four strokes, which makes the cycle of what is known as the four-cycle engine.
To the American the most interesting part of the development of internal-combustion engines is that played by Brayton about 1872 to 1874. This engine is shown in Fig. 5. The Brayton engine was to some extent the precursor of the present Diesel engine. The mixture of gas and air burned at constant pressure and gave a card resembling somewhat that of the steam engine. This engine was manufactured for a while, but was not able to compete with the Otto-Langen free-piston engine in economy. It was adapted for both gas and petroleum.

The well-known Otto engine was invented by Dr. Nicholas Otto, of Germany, and was patented in this country in 1877. It follows the cycle that has been described by Beau de Rochas , now known as the four-cycle, or sometimes as the Otto cycle. The engine was first known as the Otto-Silent, to distinguish it from the free-piston engine, which was rather noisy. It immediately established the internal-combustion engine on a firm footing, and the engines of the four-cycle type sold today show merely minor improvements. The sliding valve on 1876 has been replaced by poppet valves, and the flame ignition has been replaced by the electric spark. Otherwise, the Otto cycle of 1876 has persisted and at this time thousands of them are being manufactured.

The development of the Diesel engine for oil began about 1894. As has been stated, this engine is similar to the Brayton. Air is compressed to about 500 pounds pressure and oil is sprayed into this highly compressed air. It burns spontaneously at nearly constant pressure, which is followed by a long expansion. The extremely high temperature of the air previous to the injection of the fuel, and the high temperature maintained during this injection, together with the long expansion, give the engine the highest efficiency of any thermal motor. The development of the Diesel engine has been so recent that it is not necessary to elaborate upon it. At this time, it is being manufactured in all of the European countries and in America, and there is a tendency on the part of many of the American manufacturers who are bringing out new engines to adopt the features of the Diesel. The gas turbine is as yet in the experimental stage. A number have been built and are of course, extremely interesting. The success of the steam turbine has encouraged many to believe that the gas turbine will achieve similar success. Nothing of recent development can be said to encourage this view. The difficulties in the way of successful gas turbines are very great, and while some turbines have been designed and run, none of them has shown an efficiency at all comparable to that of ordinary four-cycle engines.





 

External Combustion engines

The difference between internal and external combustion engines, as their names
suggest, is that the former burn their fuel within the power cylinder, but the latter use
their fuel to heat a gas or a vapour through the walls of an external chamber, and the
heated gas or vapour is then transferred to the power cylinder. External combustion
engines therefore require a heat



exchanger, or boiler to take in heat, and as their fuels
are burnt externally under steady conditions, they can in principle use any fuel that can
burn, including agricultural residues or waste materials
There are two main families of external combustion engines; steam engines which rely
on expanding steam (or occasionally some other vapour) to drive a mechanism; or
Stirling engines which use hot air (or some other hot gas). The use of both technologies
reached their zeniths around 1900 and have declined almost to extinction since.
However a brief description is worthwhile, since:
i. they were successfully and widely used in the past for pumping water;
ii. they both have the merit of being well suited to the use of low cost fuels such as
coal, peat and biomass;
iii. attempts to update and revive them are taking place.
and therefore they may re-appear as viable options in the longer term future.
The primary disadvantage of e.c. engines is that a large area of heat exchanger is
necessary to transmit heat into the working cylinder(s) and also to reject heat at the end
of the cycle. As a result, e.c. engines are generally bulky and expensive to construct
compared with i.c. engines. Also, since they are no longer generally manufactured they
do not enjoy the economies of mass-production available to i.e. engines. They also will
not start so quickly or conveniently as an i.c. engine; because it takes time to light the
fire and heat the machine to its working temperature.
Due to their relatively poor power/weight ratio and also the worse energy/weight ratio of
solid fuels, the kinds of applications where steam or Stirling engines are most likely to be
acceptable are for static applications such as as irrigation water pumping in areas where
petroleum fuels are not readily available but low cost solid fuels are. On the positive
side, e.c. engines have the advantage of having the potential to be much longer-lasting
than i.c. engines (100 year old steam railway locomotives are relatively easy to keep in
working order, but it is rare for i.c. engines to be used more than 20 years or so. E.c.
engines are also significantly quieter and free of vibrations than i.c. engines. The level of
skill needed for maintenance may also be lower, although the amount of time spent will
be higher, particularly due to the need for cleaning out the furnace.
Modern engineering techniques promise that any future steam or Stirling engines could
benefit from features not available over 60 years ago when they were last in general
use. Products incorporating these new developments are not yet on the market, but R&D
is in hand in various countries on a limited scale; however it will probably be some years
before a new generation of multi-fuel Stirling or steam powered pumps become
generally available.
Steam Engines
Only a limited number of small steam engines are available commercially at present;
most are for general use or for powering small pleasure boats. A serious attempt to
develop a 2kW steam engine for use in remote areas was made by the engine
designers, Ricardos, in the UK during the 1950s . That development was
possibly premature and failed, but there is currently a revival of interest in developing
power sources that can run on biomass-based fuels. However, small steam engines have always suffered from their need to meet quite
stringent safety requirements to avoid accidents due to boiler explosions, and most
countries have regulations requiring the certification of steam engine boilers, which is a
serious, but necessary, inhibiting factor.
The principle of the steam engine is illustrated in Fig. 102. Fuel is burnt in a furnace and
the hot gases usually pass through tubes surrounded by water (fire tube boilers). Steam
is generated under pressure; typically 5 to 10 atmospheres (or 5-10bar). A safety valve
is provided to release steam when the pressure becomes too high so as to avoid the risk
of an explosion. High pressure steam is admitted to a power cylinder through a valve,
where it expands against a moving piston to do work while its pressure drops. The inlet
valve closes at a certain point, but the steam usually continues expanding until it is close
to atmospheric pressure, when the exhaust valve opens to allow the piston to push the
cooled and expanded steam out to make way for a new intake of high pressure steam.
The valves are linked to the drive mechanism so as to open or close automatically at the
correct moment. The period of opening of the inlet valve can be adjusted by the operator
to vary the speed and power of the engine.
In the simplest types of engine the steam is exhausted to the atmosphere. This however
is wasteful of energy, because by cooling and condensing the exhausted steam the
pressure can be reduced to a semi-vacuum and this allows more energy to be extracted
from a given throughput of steam and thereby significantly improves the efficiency.
When a condenser is not used, such as with steam railway locomotives, the jet of
exhaust steam is utilised to create a good draught for the furnace by drawing the hot
gases up the necessarily short smoke stack. Condensing steam engines, on the other
hand, either need a high stack to create a draught by natural convection, or they need
fans or blowers.
Steam pumps can easily include a condenser, since the pumped water can serve to cool
the condenser. According to Mead, (and others) the typical gain in overall efficiency
from using a condenser can exceed 30% extra output per unit of fuel used. Condensed
steam collects as water at the bottom of the condenser and is then pumped at sufficient
pressure to inject it back into the boiler by a small water feed pump, which is normally
driven off the engine. A further important advantage of a condensing steam engine is
that recirculating the same water reduces the problems of scaling and corrosion that
commonly occur when a continuous throughput of fresh water is used. A clean and
mineral-free water supply is normally necessary for non-condensing steam engines to
prolong the life of the boiler.
The most basic steam engine is about 5% efficient (steam energy to mechanical shaft
energy - the furnace and boiler efficiency of probably between 30 and 60% needs to be
compounded with this to give an overall efficiency as a prime-mover in the 1.5 to 3%
range). More sophisticated engines are around 10% efficient, while the very best reach
15%. When the boiler and furnace efficiencies (30-60%) plus the pump (40-80%) and
pipework (40-90%) are compounded, we obtain system efficiencies for steam piston
engine powered pumps in the 0.5 to 4.5% range, which is worse, but not a lot worse
than for small s.i. internal combustion engines pumping systems, but allows the use of
non-petroleum fuels and offers greater durability.
Stirling Engines
This type of engine was originally developed by the Rev. Robert Stirling in 1816. Tens of
thousands of small Stirling engines were used in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
century, mainly in the USA but also in Europe. They were applied to all manner of small
scale power purposes, including water pumping. In North America they particularly saw
service on the "new frontier"; which at that time suffered all the problems of a developing
country in terms of lack of energy resources, etc.
Rural electrification and the rise of the small petrol engine during and after the 1920s
overtook the Stirling engine, but their inherent multi-fuel capability, robustness and
durability make them an attractive concept for re-development for use in remote areas in
the future and certain projects are being initiated to this end. Various types of directaction
Stirling-piston water pumps have been developed since the 1970s by Beale and
Sunpower Inc. in the USA, and some limited development of new engines, for example
by IT Power in the UK with finance from GTZ of West Germany is continuing.
Stirling engines use pressure changes caused by alternately heating and cooling an
enclosed mass of air (or other gas). The Stirling engine has the potential to be more
efficient than the steam engine, and also it avoids the boiler explosion and scaling
hazards of steam engines. An important attribute is that the Stirling engine is almost
unique as a heat engine in that it can be made to work quite well at fractional
horsepower sizes where both i.c. engines and steam engines are relatively inefficient.
This of course makes it of potential interest for small scale irrigation, although at present
it is not a commercially available option.
To explain the Stirling cycle rigorously is a complex task. But in simple terms, a displacer
is used to move the enclosed supply of air from a hot chamber to a cold chamber via a
regenerator. When most of the air is in the hot end of the enclosed system, the internal
pressure will be high and the gas is allowed to expand against a power piston, and
conversely, when the displacer moves the air to the cool end, the pressure drops and
the power piston returns. The gas moves from the hot end to the cold end through a
regenerator which has a high thermal capacity combined with a lot of surface area, so
that the hot air being drawn from the power cylinder cools progressively on its way
through the regenerator, giving up its heat in the process; then when cool air travels
back to the power cylinder ready for the next power stroke the heat is returned from the
regenerator matrix to preheat the air prior to reaching the power cylinder. The
regenerator is vital to achieving good efficiency from a Stirling engine. It often consists of
a mass of metal gauze through which air can readily pass.
Some insight into the mechanics of a ' small Stirling engine can be gained ,
which shows a 1900 vintage Rider-Ericsson engine. The displacer cylinder projects at its
lower end into a small furnace. When the displacer descends it pushes all the air through
the re generator into the water cooled volume near the power cylinder and the pressure
in the system drops, then as the displacer rises and pulls air back into the hot space, the
pressure rises and is used to push the power piston upwards on the working stroke. The
displacer is driven off the drive shaft and runs 90° out.of phase with the power piston. An
idea of the potential value of engines such as this can be gained from records of their
performance; for example, the half horsepower Rider-Ericsson engine could raise
2.7m3
/hr of water through 20m; it ran at about 140 rpm (only) and consumed about 2kg
of coke fuel per hour. All that was needed to keep it going was for the fire to be
occasionally stoked, rather like a domestic stove, and for a drop of oil to be dispensed

onto the plain bearings every hour or so.